Logan Lucky: Movie Review (No Spoilers)
By Michael Momper
Logan Lucky is an incredibly fun and delightful bit of popcorn entertainment. Now, with that out of the way, I would like to bring up a dishonest cinema trick that has irked me for years- you can call it "quote mining". This occurs on most DVD boxes or advertisements for movies that get very few truthfully positive reviews. For example, if film critic Graham Craycraft were to say that Bad Grandpa is "Unabashedly and unapologetically awful, with absolutely zero moments of hilarity within", I would not be surprised if the film studio ran an advertisement that quoted him saying "Unabashed and unapologetic, with moments of absolute hilarity within". Believe it or not, stuff like this happens all the time in the movie business because some movies just have nothing positive to be said about them. It is always frustrating when a movie reviewer starts a sentence saying "Far from the best movie of the year..." and the advertising company will retrieve "Best Movie of the Year". You can spot this easily however... ask yourself three questions: one, does the movie have generally bad reviews from critics? It might end up quote mining. Two, have you read the quoted critic's review/does the blurb seem to betray the tone of the review? There might be quote mining present. And three, does the blurb seem to betray the sentiment that the reviewer has portrayed in past reviews? (for example, is this the fifth time this year that the critic has been quoted as saying "best movie of the year"?) There very well might be quote mining present.
So, in my typical honest and integrity-filled way of reviewing, I will write you a few movie blurbs that *actually portray how I felt about Steven Soderbergh's hilarious new hit Logan Lucky.
Logan Lucky is an incredibly fun and delightful bit of popcorn entertainment. Now, with that out of the way, I would like to bring up a dishonest cinema trick that has irked me for years- you can call it "quote mining". This occurs on most DVD boxes or advertisements for movies that get very few truthfully positive reviews. For example, if film critic Graham Craycraft were to say that Bad Grandpa is "Unabashedly and unapologetically awful, with absolutely zero moments of hilarity within", I would not be surprised if the film studio ran an advertisement that quoted him saying "Unabashed and unapologetic, with moments of absolute hilarity within". Believe it or not, stuff like this happens all the time in the movie business because some movies just have nothing positive to be said about them. It is always frustrating when a movie reviewer starts a sentence saying "Far from the best movie of the year..." and the advertising company will retrieve "Best Movie of the Year". You can spot this easily however... ask yourself three questions: one, does the movie have generally bad reviews from critics? It might end up quote mining. Two, have you read the quoted critic's review/does the blurb seem to betray the tone of the review? There might be quote mining present. And three, does the blurb seem to betray the sentiment that the reviewer has portrayed in past reviews? (for example, is this the fifth time this year that the critic has been quoted as saying "best movie of the year"?) There very well might be quote mining present.
So, in my typical honest and integrity-filled way of reviewing, I will write you a few movie blurbs that *actually portray how I felt about Steven Soderbergh's hilarious new hit Logan Lucky.
- An undeniably good time; carefree, smart, and exciting
- Hilarious and well-acted in every measure
- Extremely slick, stylish and meticulously shot
- A fun country twist on Soderbergh's excellent way of crafting, with plenty of shots reminiscent of Contagion and Ocean's Eleven
- Witty and energetic, with smart writing and plenty of good emotion
- Lighthearted and cheery, it's film-making that just keeps you entertained
Comments
Post a Comment